This book argues that critics of consequentialism have not been able to make a successful and comprehensive case against all versions of consequentialism because they have been using the wrong methodology. This methodology relies on the crucial assumption that consequentialist theories share a defining characteristic. This text interprets consequentialism, instead, as a family resemblance term. On that basis, it argues quite an ambitions claim, viz. that all versions of consequentialism should be rejected, including those that have been created in response to conventional criticisms. The book covers a number of classic themes in normative.
The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered (Theory and Decision Library A:) book series pdf
Nikil Mukerji The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered (Theory and Decision Library A:) free
The Case Against Consequentialism Reconsidered (Theory and Decision Library A:) reviews
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.